[print-ready document]

GILA NEWS-COURIER SUPPLEMENT

ISSEI, NISEI, KIBEI
THE U.S. HAS PUT 110,000 PEOPLE
OF JAPANESE BLOOD
IN "PROTECTIVE CUSTODY"

FORTUNE MAGAZINE, APRIL 1944


REGISTRATION AND SEGREGATION

To all the evacuees the two words, registration and segregation, are almost as charged with emotion as that disturbing term, evacuation.  Quite simply the two nouns mean that a questionnaire was submitted to all adults in the centers to determine their loyalty or disloyalty.  On the basis of this, plus F.B.I. records and in some instances special hearings, WRA granted or denied the evacuees "leave clearance," the right to go East and find a job.  The same information was used as a basis for segregating the "disloyal" in a separate center.  About 18,000 (the "disloyal" and all their dependents) will sit out the war at Tule Lake within a high, man proof, barbed-wire enclosure, unless Japan shows more enthusiasm than she has to date for their repatriation.  (These 18,000 must not be confused with the few thousand interned by the Department of Justice. )

But separating the loyal and disloyal is not so simple a job as it might seem.  Loyalty is difficult to measure accurately on any scale, and the sifting of evacuees was clumsily handled.  The process began in February, 1943, when the Army decided to recruit a combat unit of Japanese Americans.  A registration form was printed containing twenty-eight questions to determine loyalty and willingness to fight.  It was to be filled out by all men of military age.  Someone realized that it would be well to have just such records on all adults in the centers.  Plans were changed and everyone from seventeen years of age up was given the twenty-eight questions. 

Nothing is more disastrous in a rumor-ridden, distrustful, neurotic community like a relocations center than to make one explanation of purpose today and a quite different one tomorrow.  The people, newly arrived in the WRA centers, were still stunned by their evacuation, loss of property and freedom, and were acutely conscious of their stigma as "enemy. " There was misunderstanding about the purpose of registration at most of the centers.  The questionnaire was so carelessly framed its wording had to be changed during the process of registration.  A few thousand refused to fill out the form at all.  Others, remembering that they had lost businesses, home, and their civil rights, wrote angry ("disloyal") answers.  They had no enthusiasm for defending a democratic America that had imprisoned them for no crime and without trial. 

WRA, in an effort to be fair, has granted hearing in recent months for those wishing to explain the answers they made in anger and confusion.  Pride made few people stick to what they first wrote.  There is little question that the majority of adults sent to Tule Lake feel loyalty to Japan, but there are also behind Tule's fences a few thousand who are not disloyal. 

Most of the Issei who chose Tule Lake are there because of firm ties of loyalty to Japan, or strong ties of family relationships.  Some Issei were afraid of bringing reprisals upon their relatives in Japan by affirming loyalty to the U.S. The parents who chose Tule Lake usually have taken all their children with them.  Only a few sons and daughters over seventeen, who had the right to choose for themselves, could resist strong family pressure.  It is ironic and revealing that at the high school at Tule Lake, civics and American history are popular elected courses. 

Japan, however, makes no legal claims of protective interest in the Nisei or Kibei.  When the Spanish consul visits Tule to report conditions to Japan, he is legally concerned only with the welfare of the Issei, the nationals of Japan.  And, under U.S. law, the Nisei and Kibei cannot abrogate their American citizenship during wartime, even if they want to.  Their expatriation, and even the repatriation of most of the Issei to Japan, during the war, is unlikely.  Negotiations for the exchange of civilian war prisoners have been slow, and the delay is due to Japan, not to the U.S. State Department. 

To a minority living at Tule Lake, Japan's unwillingness to arrange frequent exchange of prisoners is not disheartening.  This minority does not want to set sail for Japan; it wants to stay in the U.S. People are at Tule Lake for many complicated reasons besides "disloyalty" and family relationships.  There is evidence, for example, that some chose this kind of imprisonment for reasons of security and wariness.  This is indicated by the percentage of people in various centers who said they wanted to be segregated.  When the decision was made last fall to turn Tule Lake camp into a segregation center, nearly 6,000 out of 13,000 residents of that center decided to stay put.  This high percentage of "disloyal," the highest in many[sic] center, is explained in part by unwillingness to be uprooted and moved again.  In the Minidoka relocation center, in Idaho, only 225 people out of 7,000 chose to go to Tule. 

There are a few tired and discouraged people from other WRA centers who went to Tule Lake because they know that the barbed-wire fences in that camp would stand permanently throughout the war.  They reasoned that they would have certain refuge for the duration, while the other centers, according to evacuee rumor, might be abruptly closed, and everyone turned loose without resources. 

Some chose Tule Lake imprisonment as a gesture against what they consider the broken promises of democracy.  For example, there is a young Nisei who enlisted in California early in 1941 because he felt strongly about fascism.  He was abruptly thrown out of his country's army after the Japanese attacked the U.S. and put behind the fences along with all the other evacuees.  In February, 1943, when he was handed a questionnaire on loyalty and his willingness to defend the U.S., he was too angry to prove his "loyalty" that way; he had already amply demonstrated it.  He is at Tule Lake, not because of his love for Japan, but as a protest to the government he honestly wanted to serve back in 1941. 

There is a Japanese American who fought in the last war in the U.S. Army, and is a member of the American Legion.  When the Japanese struck Pearl Harbor, he offered his services to the Army and to industry in California.  He was turned down.  Sent to a relocation center he became a "troublemaker", with the slogan, "If you think you are an American, try walking out the gate. " He was packed off to an "isolation center," and finally wound up at Tule Lake.  Last year the U.S. Treasury received a check from him, mailed from behind Tule's barbed wire.  it was a sum in excess of $100 and represented his income tax for the calendar year, 1942, when he had received belated payment for his 1941 services as navigator on a Portuguese ship.  He insisted on paying his tax, as usual.  He has, of course no wish to got to Japan.  He too sits out the war at Tule Lake in protest against failure of democracy. 

The minority who are in Tule for reasons of weariness or protest are not important numerically.  But they show what can happen to people who are confused, discouraged, or justifiably angry.  They reveal some ugly scars inflicted by our society.  It is too early to speculate about what will happen to these 18,000 prisoners.  A few thousand, at the most, may get abroad the Gripsholm.  Will all the rest be shipped finally to a defeated Japan? Or will they be a postwar U.S. problem?


back | forward
[print-ready document]